The African Network Information Centre (AFRINIC) has leveled serious accusations against one of its members, Cloud Innovation Limited (CIL), alleging that the company is trying to “paralyse” the organization through extensive litigation. As the regional internet registry for Africa, AFRINIC is responsible for assigning and managing IP addresses and autonomous system numbers across the continent.
Background of the Dispute
AFRINIC’s troubles with CIL date back to 2021 when the registry accused the company of breaching its service agreement by misusing IPv4 addresses. This led AFRINIC to initiate procedures that could have resulted in the withdrawal of CIL’s IP resources. In response, CIL filed multiple lawsuits, which severely hampered AFRINIC’s ability to appoint a board or CEO, thereby obstructing its operational capabilities.
Current Legal Challenges
Despite electing a new board in 2025 and announcing plans to resume normal operations, AFRINIC has recently expressed a more dire outlook. In a public statement, the organization described facing a “web of litigation and procedural roadblocks” instigated by CIL, Larus Ltd, and associated advocacy campaigns. These challenges include legal actions aimed at preventing AFRINIC from issuing new IPv4 addresses and objections to the formation of a committee for bylaw changes.
Community Response and Implications
AFRINIC’s statement highlights concerns over campaigns encouraging members to submit pre-drafted protest letters, which the organization claims are designed to further entangle it in legal proceedings. The registry warned that ongoing instability could hinder its ability to serve its members effectively and obstruct initiatives aimed at community development, such as training and research.
Broader Context in Internet Governance
AFRINIC’s situation has drawn attention within the broader internet governance community. The African Dialogue on Internet Governance (AfroDIG) recently published an article framing CIL’s actions as part of a prolonged conflict against AFRINIC. The article emphasized that AFRINIC’s revised IP address transfer policy, which was approved through transparent processes, contradicts business models that treat African-issued number resources as liquid assets for global leasing.
As AFRINIC continues to navigate these challenges, it remains to be seen how the ongoing legal battles will affect its operations and the broader landscape of internet governance in Africa.
This article was produced by NeonPulse.today using human and AI-assisted editorial processes, based on publicly available information. Content may be edited for clarity and style.
